Silvia Club of NSW

Why drive when you can drift?
It is currently Fri Nov 01, 2024 5:30 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: To CA or not to CA?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:25 pm 
Offline
T78

Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 10:31 pm
Posts: 532
Car: xxxxx
Real Name: xxxxxxx
Hey all,

I am looking at getting a CA onevia for a daily/time attack and sometimes drift car. This CA has been rebuilt with forged internals and has a KKR430 turbo.

My drift car is an SR 180 with a 2871 so im getting used to that, I need to know if the CA is tough enough to handle oil surge and general thashing. I have also heard they have oil problems where too much oil gets to the head at high RPM, is this true? I will also be running an oil cooler, bigger radiator with the stock clutch fan and shroud to combat the cooling issues. I will also be running Saber series 2 guages with warning alarms for water/oil temp and oil pressure.

Also will it be too laggy for a circuit/drift setup? My SR gets full boost (17psi) at around 4200 RPM so needs a bit of clutch kicking but that’s ok. Will it be similar for this CA?

Are the boxes weaker than the SR boxes at all?

Cheers
Kirk


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 2:37 pm 
Offline
T03 Hybrid
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 10:35 am
Posts: 155
Location: down the rabbit hole
Car: s13 silvia
can't comment on the CA with any authority as I have never owned one.

I would be bloody suss on a KKR turbo, however. Don't count on it lasting very long, expect oil leaks and shaft play from day one.

Also, a KKR330 had nice response and power (200+) when connected to a SR20 with stock cams.

I would expect a KKR430 to be somewhat laggy. Not withstanding the poor build quality and short life expectancy of the turbo, a 430 + CA combo doesn't sound like the right choice for someone who wants a responsive car. You might get some nice peak power out of it though.

for reference, my KKR needed mods to its waste gate flap to ensure it could close correctly from day 1, and then lasted less than 3000 kms before leaking oil into the exhaust causing masses of smoke.

When removed it had significant shaft play and is now hanging on the wall of broken parts.

Maybe I was unlucky. Maybe KKR turbos are shit.

Keep in mind they cost about 700 bucks new, and you get what you pay for.

_________________
To err is human, but to really fuck things up you need a computer


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: To CA or not to CA?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:16 pm 
Offline
Twin T66
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 12:42 am
Posts: 1218
Location: North Sydney, NSW
Car: 1988 Nissan Silvia Ks
Killabeez wrote:

Are the boxes weaker than the SR boxes at all?



Same gearbox and tailshaft as an SR20, just a different bellhousing.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group